The income gap is growing faster in the United States than in any other developed nation. Between 1990 and 2000 in the U.S. worker pay and inflation remained approximately equal, while corporate profits rose 93 per cent and CEO pay rose 571 per cent. This pattern is being repeated on a global scale, says Prof. Paul Buchheit. Corporate income tax has fallen from 33 per cent in the 1950s to 11.9 per cent in 2005, suggesting that U.S. capitalism is a poor economic model to imitate.

We all believe that a growing economy is a good thing. Corporate successes make America strong, and international monetary policies have been designed to promote economic growth around the world.

But something is wrong. The income gap is growing faster in the United States than in any other developed nation. Between 1990 and 2000 in the U.S. worker pay and inflation remained approximately equal, while corporate profits rose 93 per cent and CEO pay rose 571 per cent.

Meanwhile, the portion of federal revenue derived from corporate income tax has decreased from 33 per cent in the 1950s to 11.9 per cent in 2005, reaching a low of 7.4 per cent in 2003. Hundreds of companies have avoided taxes by relocating to tax havens such as Bermuda and the Cayman Islands. Eighty-two of our largest corporations paid no tax in at least one of the first three years of the Bush administration.

Around the world, the income gap has increased between and within countries. Workers' share of national income in developed countries is at its lowest level in 30 years. Our agricultural subsidies enrich a few people while making it impossible for farmers in the developing world to sell their crops in their own countries.

Around the world, the income gap has
increased between and within countries.

According to the United Nations Report on the World Social Situation 2005, the OECD countries that have most vigorously implemented economic policies have experienced the greatest increases in inequality within their countries. The money doesn't reach the people most in need. The New Economics Foundation reports that only 60 cents out of every US$100 of world income goes to those in extreme poverty, much less than in the 1980s before the growth of structural adjustment policies. Globalized markets seem to reward those with the education, financial wherewithal, and business skills to make them work.

We're letting domestic and multinational corporations, with their uncompromising profit motive and strong connection to the military, determine the future course of our country and the world. Terrorism has replaced communism as the major threat to our lifestyle. But corporate defense contractors - Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, and General Dynamics - take millions of dollars from the federal treasury every DAY to produce Cold-War-era weapons, with their profits guaranteed by the American public.

We're the leading seller of arms to the world. We intervene in more countries than ever before, even though studies show that intervention is tied to terrorism. Our elected representatives listen to businessmen and generals rather than to scientists, doctors, humanitarians, teachers, mothers. And we've been conditioned to believe that this is the way it must be.

Our elected representatives listen
to businessmen and generals rather than
to scientists, doctors, humanitarians,
teachers, mothers. And we've been
conditioned to believe that
this is the way it must be.

But it doesn't have to be this way. While macroeconomic business models have benefited the rich and the well educated, projects like the Millennium Villages in Africa go in the other direction, empowering poor communities by supporting agricultural improvements, clean water facilities, schools, and health care centers. Microcredit programs, as exemplified by Nobel Peace Prize winner Muhammed Yunus' program of small loans to Bangladesh women, have allowed people to liberate themselves by working their way out of poverty.

The independence and self-respect achieved by millions of small entrepreneurs is making a difference where IMF and multinational corporate policies have failed. Initiatives like these make the whole world safer, more productive, and more respectable. And they suggest that our brand of capitalism may not be the best way to help people.

Note: Paul Buchheit is a Professor, Harold Washington College in Chicago. He can be reached at: pbuchheit@ccc.edu. The above article was posted on www.counterpunch.org.






Click on the banner for more artwork by Michael Dickinson.

For more... email singbigo@singnet.com.sg with the message, "Put me on your mailing list."

 
March 2, 2007